<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food with Serial Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/06/18/food-with-serial-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/06/18/food-with-serial-numbers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/06/18/food-with-serial-numbers/#comment-14629</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stantonchampion.com/?p=219#comment-14629</guid>
		<description>I'm with Christi...my first, knee-jerk thought was, "What, was it brought in from Payard or something?"  Your use of the word 'dreadful' suggests that it was not. :-)

Maybe it's a gimmick...make you think there must be something special about it if it's a freaking piece of *cake* with a serial number.  Why else would they go to the trouble?

Unfortunately, if the gimmick sets expectations the performance can't meet, it's just tacky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Christi&#8230;my first, knee-jerk thought was, &#8220;What, was it brought in from Payard or something?&#8221;  Your use of the word &#8216;dreadful&#8217; suggests that it was not. :-)</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a gimmick&#8230;make you think there must be something special about it if it&#8217;s a freaking piece of *cake* with a serial number.  Why else would they go to the trouble?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, if the gimmick sets expectations the performance can&#8217;t meet, it&#8217;s just tacky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/06/18/food-with-serial-numbers/#comment-12478</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stantonchampion.com/?p=219#comment-12478</guid>
		<description>Reply: the cake was dreadful, so I can't possibly believe anyone would think it was "limited edition" anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply: the cake was dreadful, so I can&#8217;t possibly believe anyone would think it was &#8220;limited edition&#8221; anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christi</title>
		<link>http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/06/18/food-with-serial-numbers/#comment-12475</link>
		<dc:creator>Christi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stantonchampion.com/?p=219#comment-12475</guid>
		<description>Counterargument: Numbering increases perceived worth on the basis that it's "limited edition".  Similar to art print numbering, or limited edition books.  You got a special dessert that is so important that it needs to be accounted for individually and they only make a limited number.
A very different idea than a serial number or a bar code which obscures individuality.  In other words: numbering people = bad, numbering things = good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counterargument: Numbering increases perceived worth on the basis that it&#8217;s &#8220;limited edition&#8221;.  Similar to art print numbering, or limited edition books.  You got a special dessert that is so important that it needs to be accounted for individually and they only make a limited number.<br />
A very different idea than a serial number or a bar code which obscures individuality.  In other words: numbering people = bad, numbering things = good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
