<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expensive Small Cars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/05/05/expensive-small-cars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/05/05/expensive-small-cars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/05/05/expensive-small-cars/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 02:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stantonchampion.com/?p=208#comment-3174</guid>
		<description>Greg:  Agreed completely.  Apple is a great example of doing less and charging more for the experience.  Back in "the day," a great computer came laden with all of the latest and most powerful stuff.  They were big, expandable, and fast.  Today, I own a Mac that's small, reasonably fast, and barely expandable.  It's a better computer.

Andie:  Somewhat related, but see &lt;a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg:  Agreed completely.  Apple is a great example of doing less and charging more for the experience.  Back in &#8220;the day,&#8221; a great computer came laden with all of the latest and most powerful stuff.  They were big, expandable, and fast.  Today, I own a Mac that&#8217;s small, reasonably fast, and barely expandable.  It&#8217;s a better computer.</p>
<p>Andie:  Somewhat related, but see <a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.teslamotors.com');" rel="nofollow">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andie</title>
		<link>http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/05/05/expensive-small-cars/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>Andie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stantonchampion.com/?p=208#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>I think part of the issue is that the US automakers are based in Michigan vs. say, San Francisco or Boston, where people like cute, expensive things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the issue is that the US automakers are based in Michigan vs. say, San Francisco or Boston, where people like cute, expensive things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.stantonchampion.com/2008/05/05/expensive-small-cars/#comment-3113</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stantonchampion.com/?p=208#comment-3113</guid>
		<description>I think Apple has taken advantage of other companies underestimating the value of small as well.  Not a perfect analogy since most gadgets are clearly better small, but still...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Apple has taken advantage of other companies underestimating the value of small as well.  Not a perfect analogy since most gadgets are clearly better small, but still&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
